Quote:
Cami, though they're Christian books, the Chronicles of Narnia aren't allegorical. C.S. Lewis wrote them with the question posed of, what if there were another fallen world, how would the Word visit that world to save it, if the world consisted of talking beasts? He felt that He would go as a talking animal, or Lion. But there isn't anything in Narnia that represents something on earth, so it's not allegorical.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I've read quite the opposite elsewhere. Not saying that what I've read was right, of course. The dictionary (well, dictionary.com) defines allegory as "The representation of abstract ideas or principles by characters, figures, or events in narrative, dramatic, or pictorial form," I believe the Narnia books fall well into that. Perhaps parable would be a better word, however.
Quote:
Though I am not overly thrilled with the new Pontiff, I think Pope Benedict XVI had it right when he said that there was no harm reading the Harry Potter books so long as children can tell the difference between reality and fiction.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I totally agree with this. Most people who are old enough to read a book as big as any of the Harry Potter books on their own, is fully capable of knowing the differences between real and fantasy.